Web Site Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

About NAPPSI | Primary Prevention | Member Information | News | Technologies | Regulatory/Legislative
Education | Resources | Contact Us | Home Page



NAPPSI Letter to AHA

November 6, 2003


Mr. Dick Davidson
President
American Hospital Association
One North Franklin
Chicago, Ill. 60606

Re: Support of residents’ request to notify AHA members of OSHA violations

Dear Mr. Davidson:

The National Alliance for the Primary Prevention of Sharps Injuries (NAPPSI) is a non-profit organization that works to protect America’s healthcare workers against medical sharps injuries. We emphasize primary prevention of needlesticks, through technologies and approaches that reduce or eliminate the use of sharps. While our focus is on primary prevention, we also support other effective means to reduce the frightening toll that needlesticks take on America’s healthcare workers.

Accordingly, NAPPSI urges AHA to comply with the request you recently received from medical residents at Montefiore Medical Center, the American Medical Students Association, and Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. Their request – that you notify your membership of recent OSHA violations found at Montefiore – has the potential to significantly advance the cause of needlestick safety. We believe that you and your membership are committed to needlestick safety, and the OSHA findings are significant enough to merit the special attention of your members. In particular from the standpoint of primary prevention, OSHA noted the medical center’s failure to use needleless devices and engineering controls to draw blood from central lines and to secure catheters and tubes.

NAPPSI does not advocate the use of particular brands of devices. We do, however, strongly encourage healthcare facilities to first use primary prevention technologies when implementing needlestick safety. For example, in addition to its Bloodborne Pathogens Standards (covering technologies such as needleless access devices), OSHA has clarified the requirement for healthcare facilities to consider sutureless securement devices, in ruling issued in January 2003 (www.osha.gov/SLTC/bloodbornepathogens/index.html, under "New Interpretation Letters").

Page 2


NAPPSI has developed two resources that we believe can be of significant value to your members. First, we created and maintain the most comprehensive and current compilation of needlestick safety devices, categorized by the kind of device and whether it offers primary or secondary prevention. This NAPPSI list is based upon the respected device compilation by the International Healthcare Worker Safety Center, at the University of Virginia, and is updated monthly. Please note that while our membership includes device manufacturers – along with more than 3,000 individual clinicians and most of the leading clinician organizations in the field – membership in NAPPSI is not required for a device to be included on the Safety Device List.

Second, our Clinician Advisory on needlestick safety builds upon the general direction provided by NIOSH and other safety authorities. This advisory has been widely disseminated by clinician organizations and government safety authorities. Both the device list and advisory are available at www.nappsi.org/safety.shtml.

Based on feedback from our members, NAPPSI has recently launched a special campaign to target the epidemic of suture needle injuries among interns and residents. The campaign is known as PAIRSS (Protecting America’s Interns and Residents from Suture-needle Sticks). According to the University of Virginia authorities, suture needlesticks are most common sharps injuries suffered by interns and residents in teaching hospitals. We encourage AHA members to do everything they can to reduce the toll taken by suture sticks, which are documented sources of hepatitis and AIDS.

Specifically, we recommend AHA encourage its member institutions to implement the following four measures to drive down suture needlestick injuries:

1) The use of surgical glues instead of suture where applicable;
2) The use of safety surgical instruments that render traditional suturing either
safer or unnecessary;
3) Discontinuation of the use of straight (Keith) suture needles;
4) Use of sutureless safety securement devices for catheters and tubing.

Thank you for your careful attention to these vitally important issues. Please let me know if NAPPSI can assist in any way, as AHA moves forward with what we hope will be an aggressive effort to prevent sharps injuries, by providing your members with information on how they can best avoid the consequences of noncompliance with OSHA’s needlestick safety mandates.

Sincerely,


Steven F. Bierman, M.D.
President
National Alliance for the Primary Prevention of Sharps Injuries